undefined | Better HN

0 pointswongarsu6y ago0 comments

Europe is much more relaxed about nudity (exposed breasts in prime time TV are fine) but much more restrictive about violence and gore. Instead US companies enforce US standards on us.

Even child porn isn't an easy subject. Everyone can agree that liking 12 year olds sexually is pedophilia and images about that are child porn. But when we are taking about 16 year olds it's muddier since we are taking about child porn outside of pedophilia.

And that's just (north western) Europe who are culturally very similar to the US.

0 comments

unlinked_dll6y ago

>But when we are taking about 16 year olds it's muddier since we are taking about child porn outside of pedophilia.

It's not muddier. The issue isn't the nature of the people viewing the content, but the ability of the victim to consent to the creation of the content. There's no muddiness involved here - sexual exploitation of minors for the production of media is not ok.

wongarsuOP6y ago

"Minor" is a very cultural term, the US steps of adulthood at 18 and 21 are more comparable with 16 and 18 in Europe. Also a 16 year old can consent to sex, so why not to images (particularly ones they made themselves and distribute to single persons).

For 12 year olds it's much easier with the "we don't support pedophilia" argument (which has wide support)