There are things Google Analytics does poorly, though, like Goals (which don't work for Events, aren't retroactive, and are limited to 20 per profile) and Funnels (which are even more rigid than Goals).
I wish MixPanel well, since a competitive analytics space is good for us all, but the developer they quoted could use some advice on how to maximize his/her Google Analytics experience. Can't beat the price tag!
Mixpanel is neat though.
Unfortunately it just ticked over on the month, so there's not much history there. For reference in the current numbers, I've been watching it for about 6 months if memory serves, and before the banner went up, it only broke 100k once. It's been getting 200k+ since the banner went up. So somewhere between double and triple the queries.
Probably true for most billboards, but the 101 on the peninsula might be the one place in the world it makes sense (box.net has some great ads; AOL and Zynga have ads looking for job applicants)
Mixpanel's argument is that you don't need the service Google and others offer (page view stats)--you need a different service, and Mixpanel offers that.
Their web2.0 metrics are superior to traditional measures, but a one-way communications medium that has been popular for over five hundred years is apparently superior to any type of online advertising, so much so that you don't even care about the metrics.
This is the worst message/medium mismatch I could imagine.
how does facebook compensate here? i believe engagement is more important, but are the lost pageviews really of no matter? how does it play into alexa etc?