undefined | Better HN

0 pointstimbit426y ago0 comments

For the same reasons the time format HH:MM:SS is objectively correct and and not HH:SS:MM, SS:MM:HH, MM:SS:HH, SS:HH:MM, or MM:HH:SS.

0 comments

gtirloni6y ago

No, dates are for humans not computers sorting things. DD-MM-YYYY is "objectively better" because that's how most humans read dates. See where this is going?

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointstimbit426y ago0 comments

For the same reasons the time format HH:MM:SS is objectively correct and and not HH:SS:MM, SS:MM:HH, MM:SS:HH, SS:HH:MM, or MM:HH:SS.

0 comments

gtirloni6y ago

No, dates are for humans not computers sorting things. DD-MM-YYYY is "objectively better" because that's how most humans read dates. See where this is going?

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse