undefined | Better HN

0 pointsSamReidHughes6y ago0 comments

There isn't a similar existence of privacy rights.

0 comments

ceejayoz6y ago

SCOTUS begs to differ, in Griswold v. Connecticut. So do various state laws.

kube-system6y ago

It's a pretty big stretch to say that location and financial data is protected by a right to marital privacy.

ceejayoz6y ago

It would be odd to think marital privacy the only right to privacy the Constitution establishes.

1 more reply

SamReidHughesOP6y ago

A case about access to contraception has nothing to do with free speech at all, nor is it even the same kind of "privacy." They're two different concepts, with the same word.

ceejayoz6y ago

Griswold v. Connecticut established that the Constitution has some inherent rights to privacy. I cite it as you claim those rights don’t exist.

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 comments

ceejayoz6y ago

SCOTUS begs to differ, in Griswold v. Connecticut. So do various state laws.

kube-system6y ago

It's a pretty big stretch to say that location and financial data is protected by a right to marital privacy.

ceejayoz6y ago

It would be odd to think marital privacy the only right to privacy the Constitution establishes.

1 more reply

SamReidHughesOP6y ago

A case about access to contraception has nothing to do with free speech at all, nor is it even the same kind of "privacy." They're two different concepts, with the same word.

ceejayoz6y ago

Griswold v. Connecticut established that the Constitution has some inherent rights to privacy. I cite it as you claim those rights don’t exist.

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse