undefined | Better HN

0 pointsmd5person6y ago0 comments

Thanks.

So, a given "specification" (how a font looks to the human eye) can have many different "implementations" (ie. TTF files). The specific "implementations" themselves can be copyrighted, but somehow not the "specifications"?

If so... assume one TTF file which is copyrighted, pay-per-use license. Assume another TTF file, which is open-source, free to use and redistribute. The files both implement the "Helvetica" specification, rendering the same letters to the human eye. How "different" must the free implementation be from the paid one, for it to not be considered an infringement?

0 comments

runxel6y ago

Since the shapes afaik can't be copyrighted: Your selfdrawn font has totally the right to look the same.

They probably won't however, since you might be able to copy the shape, but for being displayed on screen you need a process called "hinting". That is the term for making pixels out of the shapes. Professional fonts are hinted by hand, making it look neat even in small sizes. There is auto-hinting, but it only gets you so far.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsmd5person6y ago0 comments

Thanks.

0 comments

runxel6y ago

Since the shapes afaik can't be copyrighted: Your selfdrawn font has totally the right to look the same.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse