The reason why so much electricity is being used on BTC is a result of an arms race between miners, not a necessity of the technical specification. Bitcoin would still operate correctly with less mining capacity. What is sacrificed is that the threshold for mounting a 51% attack becomes lower with less miners. But again, the network itself does not need a nation-state's worth of electricity to operate.
A price crash that forces a bunch of miners off the network means that, not only is a 51% attack cheaper, but the spare capacity to launch one exists, and is just sitting there unused, losing money.
A volatile combination.
If the cost of the hashing power is less than the value, then the incentive is to just buy the hashing power and do the 51% attacks.
So to the extent that bitcoin has any value at all, it's going to either burn an amount of electricity greater than the value of a network compromise, or it's not going to be secure.
So, maybe you mean 3 independent parties.. but what's to stop those 3 people from colluding for their own benefit, etc..
Anyway you need a hell of a lot more than 3 to run it.
As happened in parts of California last year?
How are you imagining they would do it?