> You're really stuck on this desire to expose my fraudulent underlying motivations for not wanting homeless people to die in the streets
What's fraudulent is your shameless promotion of taxing a direct competitor of your employer.
Many of your comments on this HN story have included a plug for the tax amazon pac, making all those comments basically political spam and spam has no place on HN.
> You'll be happy to learn far smarter people than you have taken a crack at this problem! Go read the first few sections of Industrial Society and its Future
Referencing the Unabomber? Really? Someone sending mail bombs and killing innocent people is your idea of "far smarter people than you have taken a crack at this problem"? In one breathe you say you don't want people dying in the street, and in the next you're quoting a serial murderer.
> your (frankly, extremely basic) idea that everyone must have a financial stake in policy to desire its realization.
People can desire the realization of whatever policy they want. However, if they have no skin in the game, that desire can be summarily dismissed by others, especially by those that do have skin in the game.
