Someone else above in the thread believes there is "great value" in being able to accomodate complexity, what the commenter refers to as a "general" solution, as well as this being worth any cost in performance. God help you if these are the type of people who are doing the interviews. Despite pedantic technical questions, I doubt they are actually screening for crucial skills like reducing complexity. Rather, the expectation is that the tech worker will tolerate complexity, including the "solutions" to managing it that are themselves adding more complexity, e.g., abstraction.

Just focus on staying relevant with new languages and ignore the hypetrain that is k8s. Its something you can learn on the job and can easily talk your way around in an interview.

The older i get the more i realise the less i want in my stacks.

This article listed as a benefit, frequent, multiple major updates each year, new features and no sign of it slowing down. I just cringed and wondered who the fuck is asking for this headache?

Ive been working a lot with wordpress lately and the stability of the framework is spoiling me rotten.