undefined | Better HN

0 pointsinvalidOrTaken5y ago0 comments

Games have certain advantages over real life in terms of providing experience:

--- shorter feedback loops: you can play through a game of Civilization in a few hours/days. There is no analogous real-life experience.

--- non-severe failure consequences: If you fail in Kerbal Space Program, there is no Challenger explosion

--- repetition: Real life usually doesn't provide similar conditions to make for valid experiments. Games can do exactly that

--- breadth of experience: In the same way books transport us, and let us visit other places and situations, games can do the same.

0 comments

platz5y ago

> you can play through a game of Civilization in a few hours/days. There is no analogous real-life experience.

If it's not analogous to real-life experience, you haven't gained any tacit knowledge that useful for real life.

> If you fail in Kerbal Space Program, there is no Challenger explosion

If you're involved in launching Challenger, you don't (and wouldn't) learn how to do so by playing Kerbal Space Program.

> In the same way books transport us, and let us visit other places and situations, games can do the same.

Yes, just like music - but that is a different thing than gaining tacit knowledge that can be used in a real-life situation. Lets not confuse arts with professional development.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse