undefined | Better HN

0 pointsmdoms5y ago0 comments

> If Gmail or Twitter can do it, so can you.

I don't have the resources or user base of Gmail or Twitter. Not even close.

0 comments

Making a HTML-only website backed by server-side code is generally easier than having two interacting application - one on server, one on client. My point was that even complex, popular apps can easily be implemented in HTML-only without loss of functionality.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsmdoms5y ago0 comments

> If Gmail or Twitter can do it, so can you.

I don't have the resources or user base of Gmail or Twitter. Not even close.

0 comments

sershe5y ago

Making a HTML-only website backed by server-side code is generally easier than having two interacting application - one on server, one on client. My point was that even complex, popular apps can easily be implemented in HTML-only without loss of functionality.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse