Everyone here who disagrees is just saying, "I don't want to join those communities, so they shouldn't even be allowed to exist."
Is a hatepost sub the best of a world?
>Everyone here who disagrees is just saying, "I don't want to join those communities, so they shouldn't even be allowed to exist."
There is a huge leap between "I don't want to be a part of a hate platform" and "hate platforms shouldn't be allowed to exist."
Look, if a super laissez faire social media platform attracts a huge amount of neo-nazis then I have no interest in spending time on it's alternative vanilla areas. I don't owe anything to websites or decentralized torrent-like systems that harbor these groups. They can decide to win me over or not. My eyeballs on their vanilla shit provides legitimacy to their horrifying shit. That is very different than saying they shouldn't be allowed to exist.
This isn't a new trend of course, but I personally find it sad that the very people who claim to champion freedom and civil liberties are now actively trying to destroy them.
I think the diversity of people and their opinions in the world are scary. In the past, you could ignore or were unaware of just how different other people seemed. Now, this diversity is in the forefront, and people are scared shitless.
Ultimately, I believe that being exposed to people that disagree with you existentially shakes you and exposes you to the most scary thing imaginable: that nothing is actually true and that nothing matters. After all, if some guy believes everything I don't believe and vice versa, then maybe what I believe is arbitrary, made-up, and confabulated. And if that is the case, maybe none of us know anything at all. Or, as Heidegger would put it, this contradiction of beliefs removes us from being-in-the-world, and replaces it with being-towards-death.
If you created a platform, then later found out that ISIS was using it to coordinate attacks on hospitals around the world, how would you react?