Stock markets or fiat currencies on the other hand require quite a bit of work upfront to set up an account before you can trade.
The FBI and other law enforcement is getting pretty good at tracking illicit Bitcoin transactions and money laundering [1].
If these guys are professionals, they’re using mixing services to cover their tracks. Guess we’ll find out if they made any mistakes along the way.
[1] “Blueleaks: How the FBI tracks Bitcoin laundering on the dark web”—https://decrypt.co/34740/blueleaks-how-the-fbi-tracks-bitcoi...
That's my theory on why they (presumably) didn't touch the stock market or the POTUS account - even if they're found, they really can only be charged with a modest damage sum and some vague hacking accusations; nothing that warrants a global manhunt.
If they've traded into that currency somewhere, how does one know where that money pops back up - on however many exchanges, under however many identities, in however many amounts, over whatever period of time they drip it back in?
I'm reminded of a paper I read a while back about deanonymizing VPN traffic if you have sufficient observability of nodes in the overall network and something else I can't remember at the moment.
Seems different though. The time they could take to drip money back in to the visible network (for conversion to fiat or appreciation in a "visible" coin) feels like a factor.
edit - heh, just now seeing the article you posted about the FBI's team explicitly mentions a case like this with Monero.
If nothing else, it's a good way to prove capability. Want to prove your prior deeds and that you're the one that pulled off that twitter hack? Have someone provide you an address and transfer out of that wallet, and now you've got proof of control of the funds, which works pretty well as a way of verifying you are the individual/group that pulled this off if someone asks. In that way, it's a good advertising.
It’s why any claims to be Satoshi are laughable. If you want to go public, just prove it cryptographically.