undefined | Better HN

0 pointsjessriedel5y ago0 comments

That regulations are motivated by avoiding deaths does not mean that they are effective at that, or even if they are effective that they are worth the costs. Regulations that specify specific safety equipment, rather than specifying target error rates or bonds/liability, are the worst because they get enacted and then stay on the books for decades unchanged.

0 comments

danaliv5y ago

They aren’t motivated by it. They’re a result of it. Practically every rule or standard in the book can be traced to a crash. Mode C veil? Aeromexico 498, 82 dead. Radio comms standardization? Tenerife, 583 dead. CRM: United 173, 10 dead. Altitude requirements while being vectored to an approach (91.175(i)): TWA 514, 92 dead.

I could go on.

The answer to “why can’t we just” in aviation is “because people died.” The FAA doesn’t make rules just to make them. They make them because aviation is unforgiving and it will kill you and your passengers if you screw it up.

Dylan168075y ago

It sounds like you're trying to disagree with the comment you replied to but none of those facts disagree with what they said.

1 more reply

jessriedelOP5y ago

Being caused by previous deaths and being motivated to avoid future deaths are very compatible.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse