ASM is far lower level than ByteBuddy. To write some ASM code you probably want to have some proficiency with the bytecode format itself (e.g. you're typically outputting individual JVM bytecode instructions ;(invokespecial,athrow,etc). Personally I'd probably always use ByteBuddy unless I had some very specific reason why not. For comparison, these two examples https://github.com/raphw/byte-buddy#changing-existing-classe... http://web.cs.ucla.edu/~msb/cs239-tutorial/ explain how to do a System.out.println wrapper around a method.

In one case, the developer writes `System.out.println`. In the other, the developer must individually get the static field System.err and push it to the stack, reference PrintStream's method println, including the arguments (Ljava.lang.String;)V. That means it takes an array of strings and returns void.