undefined | Better HN

0 pointsTuna-Fish14y ago0 comments

In Finland, tax data is public -- you can go look up what your coworkers are making without the consent of either them or their employers. I don't think it has caused a race to the top in any meaningful way.

0 comments

copper14y ago

Norway does that too:

http://skattelister.no/skatt/profil/liv-johanne-ullmann-3417...

Edit: Heh, obviously, this has done the rounds on HN while I was asleep.

michaelochurch14y ago

Even if it causes a "race to the top", is that such a bad thing? Shouldn't most of the fruits of labor go to the people doing the work?

angusgr14y ago

I think the "race to the top" people are talking about is the psychological tendency of most people to think they are better than average.

So, if you know the average salary is $X and the top salary is $2X, and you're making $1.1X then you ask for a payrise to $1.6X because "you know you're better than most of the people here". Then everyone does. And so on.

I think the way around that is to match transparent salaries with a transparent ladder of responsibilities/expectations/experience, like you were talking about with Fog Creek.

Then there's a clear standard for people to evaluate what they are worth to the company.

gyardley14y ago

Will they be paid a fraction of their salary if the company performs poorly?

The biggest rewards go to the biggest risk-takers.

michaelochurch14y ago

I can see the point you're trying to make, but humanistically and morally speaking, this isn't true.

A person with $10 million who puts $3 million into a business isn't taking that much of a risk. There's some risk there and, yes, it should be rewarded. But a person with no net worth is taking a huge risk every time he takes a new job: career risk.

This dynamic exists in startups as well. The people who are taking the real risks are the founders, not the venture capitalists.

2 more replies

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 comments

copper14y ago

Norway does that too:

http://skattelister.no/skatt/profil/liv-johanne-ullmann-3417...

Edit: Heh, obviously, this has done the rounds on HN while I was asleep.

michaelochurch14y ago

Even if it causes a "race to the top", is that such a bad thing? Shouldn't most of the fruits of labor go to the people doing the work?

angusgr14y ago

I think the "race to the top" people are talking about is the psychological tendency of most people to think they are better than average.

I think the way around that is to match transparent salaries with a transparent ladder of responsibilities/expectations/experience, like you were talking about with Fog Creek.

Then there's a clear standard for people to evaluate what they are worth to the company.

gyardley14y ago

Will they be paid a fraction of their salary if the company performs poorly?

The biggest rewards go to the biggest risk-takers.

michaelochurch14y ago

I can see the point you're trying to make, but humanistically and morally speaking, this isn't true.

This dynamic exists in startups as well. The people who are taking the real risks are the founders, not the venture capitalists.

2 more replies

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse