The reason you're getting downvoted, so you know, is that your original response heavily indicated you _were_ talking about the email reports.
You replied to someone complaining about getting emails and defended it with "but that directory shouldn't exist", implying you disagreed with their take.
You're arguing about something here that no one else is trying to talk about. The poster you originally replied to was only talking about the email case, so your response is contextualized in that case already.
If you original post had been "Yeah, I agree. That would make sense as a CI rule that you run, not as a scanner someone else runs" then you wouldn't have gotten any pushback, but your post was strongly implying a position you apparently don't hold.