undefined | Better HN

0 pointsjjav5y ago0 comments

> Sure, an internet connection is required.

It's much worse than that. The existence of the company and their servers is required. So when those disappear, the customer-owned hardware is bricked? No thanks.

No customer-owned hardware should ever depend on the continued existence of the company that sold it.

0 comments

londons_explore5y ago

> So when those disappear, the customer-owned hardware is bricked? No thanks.

Yes please. If the company that developed some consumer networked hardware goes away, I don't want botnets of that hardware sending spam...

Software updates for security are now the norm for internet connected things, and if a piece of hardware can't be supported anymore, it will probably be exploited and siphon your private data to the highest bidder. It's far better to disable unsupportable hardware than keep using it.

If companies going bankrupt starts harming consumers, government could step in and force companies to contribute to a "support fund" for continued support of their hardware after bankruptcy if necessary.

LocalH5y ago

Thank you for advocating for the continued erosion of user rights with regards to hardware they own. How about we stop tethering devices to manufacturer servers and reserve that for optional, over-the-top features?

alisonkisk5y ago

The right to swing your fist ends at my nose.

Internet connectivity is an optional over the top feature. You don't deserve the right to be on the shared public internet using a computer someone else made if you can't be cut off for antisocial behavior.

You can make your hardware from raw components if you want.

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse