Skip to content
Better HN
Top
New
Best
Ask
Show
Jobs
Search
⌘K
undefined | Better HN
0 points
pmiller2
5y ago
0 comments
Share
The graph I linked is of
arable
land per capita. "Arable" means capable of growing crops. It does not matter that we raise animals on it currently.
0 comments
default
newest
oldest
thu2111
5y ago
Why not? Land used for crops that are then eaten by humans is more efficient than using it grow crops to feed animals. Even if you assume no animals graze on arable land (why would you assume that?) there's still large efficiencies to be had.
j
/
k
navigate · click thread line to collapse