undefined | Better HN

0 pointsdanpalmer4y ago0 comments

It seems like HA has its own plugin distribution model, whereas NixOS is trying to work around that to provide reproducible builds.

Aside from how this issue has been handled, poorly, that seems like a reasonable technical decision for HA to make, particularly given that their main use case is semi-technical user installing on a Raspberry Pi, and in that case is it something they should be forced to support? A fork seems like the right option there?

0 comments

jiofih4y ago

Nobody is actually asking them to support anything. And they “refused” a fork (which is pointless as nothing stops one from happening). They seem to want to hold some control over their software that is against the usual rules of the game for OSS.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 comments

jiofih4y ago

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse