undefined | Better HN

0 pointsukj4y ago0 comments

The conference is indeed a spoof, but in so far as what Mathematicians call a "proof" - the paper contains one. Agda is a proof assistant in the spirit of the Calculus of Constructions ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calculus_of_constructions ).

So is the joke on Computer Scientists or Mathematicians? You decide ;)

Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it --Donald Knuth

0 comments

Drup4y ago

Sigbovik's jokes are of the kind where the premise is completely bonkers. The rest of the development is made with the utmost rigor to highlight said bonkersitude, Reductio ad absurdum.

ukjOP4y ago

Yeah, but that is precisely how inductive types work.

"Bonkers" premises. Iterate, iterate, iterate. "Bonkers" conclusions. GIGO.

And yet the result is reified, exists and speaks for itself. So what is so "absurd" and "bonkers" about a result that is right before your eyes?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reification_(computer_science)

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse