[1] https://www.fox13news.com/news/red-tide-temporarily-closes-s...
[2] https://www.fox13news.com/news/in-one-day-nine-tons-of-dead-...
I'm not going to go into why nuclear is dead, but I think it's interesting that so many people think it's so easy to build more nuclear. There's a lot of things to scale of we wanted to do that, and right now the industry is scaling renewables, which isn't going to stop anytime soon, so if you want more nuclear I suggest you become a billionaire and build your own.
This story is supposed to be due to global warming / climate change, right? If so, why is it easy to find reports of the same kind of thing happening over a hundred years ago, before humans had emitted any appreciable amount of CO2?
Here's one from 1912: https://www.nytimes.com/1912/02/12/archives/hot-ocean-boils-... "HOT OCEAN BOILS FISH.; Gulf Sailors Report Passing Through Zone of Scalding Water." Inconvenient for the CO2 hypothesis, huh.
Please. Start checking for precedent when you see stories like this. I think you'll find it eye-opening.
Please. Start checking for precedent when you see stories like this. I think you'll find it eye-opening.
The math for a big newspaper is something like 100 years x
365 daily editions a year x 100+ stories per day. It's rather hard to avoid innocent repetition after you've published millions of stories.But why would they? They don't want to report "thing that happens fairly frequently happened again"... the story being scary translates directly into dollars going into their pockets. In other words, they terrify people by lying, for money.