Nobody stands up and starts with "Lets approach this irrationally and ..."
Libertarianism involves a state as weak as possible so it critically depends on people to individually make good choices for a society to be an appealing place to live. You can sue your neighbor if he burns old tires upwind but you’re really hoping he’s smart enough not to because that’s tedious, slow, and risks retaliation. If you don’t have the equivalent of Social Security forcing people to save for retirement, you have to make your peace with having destitute old people on the streets, etc.
And people keep proposing systems that do worse than that and refusing to critically assess how their ideas work out in practice vs a free market.
> And people keep proposing systems that do worse than that and refusing to critically assess how their ideas work out in practice vs a free market.
Can you provide examples of the baseline you’re using to say that other systems do worse? Successful implementations, not idealized imaginings.