It is: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2020-02-05/wind-turb...
Should probably be: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2020-02-05/wind-turb...
One little "q" to many at the end of the url
I suppose all the answers to the above questions are negative. If so, let them pile up. We will recycle them as we learn an economical way to do that.
(For hundreds of millions of years, mollusks did not recycle their calcite shells. It had major ecological and even geological consequences. Now we have literal mountains of them. Has even it made Earth a worse place? Some old blades are nothing in comparison.)
https://www.reuters.com/business/sustainable-business/end-wi... (May 2021: End of wind power waste? Vestas unveils blade recycling technology)
What are those chemicals and what happens to them after they are used?
What of solar panels, or batteries for instance?
The Planet Of The Humans - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zk11vI-7czE has a pessimistic view on the current technologies.
New wind turbines use modern composites not because they're green, but because they're new. If you want a longer lighter blade for your wind turbine you use the latest strongest composite. If you want a thinner lighter doodah you do the same kind of thing, independent of whether that doodah has a greenish tinge or not.