>Much of it is written by people who don't understand how destructive modern weapons are.
Absolutely. I don't mean to nitpic this article, because it addresses a larger point, but this quote FTA stood out:
>Hidden beneath tarpaulins and decoy construction material in the truck bed was a 7.62-mm sniper machine gun. [emphasis added]
I don't know what the hell a "sniper machine gun" is (I was in the Army for 5.5 years), but this sentence unfortunately took a lot of away from the article for me.
The way the article is written makes me think the author has a specific way they'd like this story framed, and their unfamiliarity with small arms weapons platforms is sort of giving away the game here. Remotely controlled small arms employed in a stay-behind-operation is the real story here. I don't know of another instance where this has happened.
