undefined | Better HN

0 pointssoperj4y ago0 comments

You must be taking some weird specifics here. Nothing I can see lists San Fran as second densest.

0 comments

Not really, I meant exactly what I said. It is the second densest large (> 100k) city (city proper, not metro area).

Not that specific

soperjOP4y ago

even in that regard it's third after New York City, and Paterson New Jersey.

Sure, still much higher than one might think from walking around. Certainly surprised me

More a testament to the ubiquity of sprawl in the states than anything I think

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

Not really, I meant exactly what I said. It is the second densest large (> 100k) city (city proper, not metro area).

Not that specific

soperjOP4y ago

even in that regard it's third after New York City, and Paterson New Jersey.

Sure, still much higher than one might think from walking around. Certainly surprised me

More a testament to the ubiquity of sprawl in the states than anything I think

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse