I'm not that curious about the drama, but I wish we had more info about the governance of Rust and the vision of the remaining maintainers.
If these maintainers left on bad terms, what does that mean? Is their vision incomplete? Is Rust in good hands?
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29306845
There was a lot of speculation about Amazon's role in what happened, I'm not sure if any of it was true but worth noting.
My take is that someone on the Core team violated the Code of Conduct and refused to listen to the Moderation team, and the moderation team felt undermined and resigned in protest. But they were purposefully vague (probably so as not to burn any bridges).
It seems very likely that some of these changes in the Core team are related to that
Rust is governed by the Rust Foundation, a US-based 501(c)6 trade association.
Given that, which language do you think Evil Corp has more influence in changing?
Just to be clear, the "Core Team" is different from the "Compiler Team".