You're comparing seeing ads with children consuming lead paint?
Lead paint has very obvious, bodily harm to children. Do ads harm children? Perhaps, but even if they did, there's no cost to visit a free-site without ads, or pay for a site without ads.
> You're comparing seeing ads with children consuming lead paint?
No, I’m not. You can tell, because I never made a comparison between the two.
What I did was make a hypothetical that was more extreme, with an analogy of the underlying reasoning, to make my objections to that reasoning more apparent.
