undefined | Better HN

0 pointsthe_svd_doctor4y ago0 comments

Yes but git-blame shows 17 years ago.

0 comments

Git was released 7 April 2005, I imagine it existed and was used before v1.0 release, so 17 years checks out. It is git's age, not the code.

Yes, but some of the history has been omitted. [1] Line 1035 includes the signoff "-TYT, 12/1291"

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsthe_svd_doctor4y ago0 comments

Yes but git-blame shows 17 years ago.

Git was released 7 April 2005, I imagine it existed and was used before v1.0 release, so 17 years checks out. It is git's age, not the code.

Yes, but some of the history has been omitted. [1] Line 1035 includes the signoff "-TYT, 12/1291"

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse