undefined | Better HN

0 pointsmagicalist4y ago0 comments

> He's being subjected to a federal criminal investigation. There is a bit more there than "simply being on a board". It is a big story and deserves public investigation to find out what was going on.

It came out in December that his taxes were being investigated and it was widely reported. Easy to see from the wikipedia article where there are multiple citations from major news outlets.

> It is materially interesting what business connections the US president has with (famous for being corrupt I might add) Ukraine.

What is interesting? You're playing connect the dots and taking possible tax issues from business in China and connecting it to made up stories about Burisma and saying "now prove me wrong". Again, the impetus is on the person making the argument to make an actual concrete claim. The Senate republicans already have you covered on the Ukraine part, of course (nothing).

> otherwise the decisions don't make a lot of sense

Henry Kissinger got a bunch of people to heavily invest in Theranos. You're going to need more substance than "why do rich white people keep failing upwards?" for a story here.

0 comments

roenxi4y ago

> It came out in December...

Which lends some rather solid credence to all the people back around the election who were saying this looks like fairly obvious corruption. I mean, the facts haven't really changed much, the only change is that the political establishment is OK with it being reported on in December. Anyone reading the initial story could have told you there was going to be an investigation.

Whether they'll find anything is an open question since the person who controls the executive is currently president - but it looks as shady as anything in US politics. There is little question that the big tech giants were making a political move when they took the story down on its first arrival, it would have swung votes and they didn't want that.

Not finding overwhelming evidence of money laundering can't be the story unless the original - silenced - accusations of corruption were also a story.

magicalistOP4y ago

This is a whole lot of words to refer to nothing specific.

> Not finding overwhelming evidence of money laundering can't be the story unless the original - silenced - accusations of corruption were also a story.

Not finding evidence can't be the story because the original story (which is what had no evidence), er, was a story? Again, an accusation can't pull itself up by its bootstraps. There has to be a there, there.

roenxi4y ago

The son of the president is under criminal investigations and is being offered board positions in a country famous for corruption. There is surely a cash-for-influence scheme going on. There probably is something there.

Now you may not care. I certainly don't think it is the biggest issue, this sort of corruption is pretty small biscuits compared to the damage that US politicians of Biden's tenure typically manage to do. However, the fact that there was a vigorous campaign of censorship leading up to the election is extremely weird. Which is the polite phrase for "this was a partisan lie by omission because big tech is showing their cards and those cards are Democrat".

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsmagicalist4y ago0 comments

It came out in December that his taxes were being investigated and it was widely reported. Easy to see from the wikipedia article where there are multiple citations from major news outlets.

> It is materially interesting what business connections the US president has with (famous for being corrupt I might add) Ukraine.

> otherwise the decisions don't make a lot of sense

Henry Kissinger got a bunch of people to heavily invest in Theranos. You're going to need more substance than "why do rich white people keep failing upwards?" for a story here.

0 comments

roenxi4y ago

> It came out in December...

Not finding overwhelming evidence of money laundering can't be the story unless the original - silenced - accusations of corruption were also a story.

magicalistOP4y ago

This is a whole lot of words to refer to nothing specific.

> Not finding overwhelming evidence of money laundering can't be the story unless the original - silenced - accusations of corruption were also a story.

roenxi4y ago

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse