undefined | Better HN

0 pointsDangeranger4y ago0 comments

This is a “what about … “ response.

The only important thing is if they are going to invest in new staff in the future. The old staff almost certainly have new jobs in new companies.

Let’s not move the goal posts. Having reason to invest in enhancing documentation, and creating a viable revenue stream by doing so is a good thing, even if decisions in the past are regrettable.

0 comments

qbasic_forever4y ago

No the "we'll pay for it!" comments were in the context of the staff being let go and departments spun down. We meant, we'll pay to keep this high quality content going.

No one said, sure yeah fire all those folks, flail around for a year, convince people to just give free content for funsies, then we'll slap a price tag on it so the exec bonuses can keep getting higher.

We'd pay for the old Mozilla that cared about a high quality web. That Mozilla appears to be long dead.

DangerangerOP4y ago

When people said “we will pay for it” the decision had already been made, it was too late.

Mozilla is not pay-walling the open documentation, it’s still available. They are pay-walling features that make it easier to save pages, navigate, and use the docs offline.

There are alternatives, in the form of Devdocs.io, Zeal, and Dash, if you want similar features but don’t want to pay Mozilla.

You are not losing anything you already can access to my knowledge.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse