Sure. Tip: if something's true by definition, it's usually not interesting. Substitute the appropriate phrase - "observation of a property which, in the static context, might constitute a typing judgement"? Note that we're here specifically considering things that
can be typed statically, as outside of that setting there is no question of whether static and dynamic are opposed.
The rest of your comment seems concerned with the fact that the tagging infrastructure typically needed to check these properties at runtime can also be used for other purposes. That's true, but I don't see the relevance.
