undefined | Better HN

0 pointswesturner3y ago0 comments

How can it be acyclic? A phylogenetic tree is a DAG. Organisms sharing DNA? That's definitely a cyclic graph.

If there were Schema.org/Animal and/or schema:AnimalInstance classes, what do you list under a :breed property to indicate that e.g. one parent is breed X and another is breed Y?! That's definitely not a DAG; that looks like a feature clustering dendrogram.

DNA barcoding > Mismatches between conventional (morphological) and barcode based identification https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA_barcoding#Mismatches_betwe...

Taxonomy (biology) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taxonomy_(biology)

FWIU, there's at least one DNA-based organism naming system; IDK how much that helps resolve :Animal and :AnimalInstance if at all?

0 comments

sixstringtheory3y ago

My assumption as someone not formally trained in advanced biology is that the phylogenetic tree has an implied arrow of time, and each node of the tree is a point where a mutation occurred that was sufficient to create a new and separate family/order/genus/etc afterwards, with leaf nodes representing species.

In this sense a cycle can’t occur because a branch would need to reach back in time and rejoin with an ancestral branch. It would be a different kind of grandfather paradox: who would be the ancestor and who the descendant in a cycle?

Maybe someone could help point out the flaws in this model.

flobosg3y ago

Your assumption is true, but only for rooted phylogenetic trees. In unrooted trees the node representing the most ancestral state is absent and thus no directionality can be determined.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse