undefined | Better HN

0 pointssomat3y ago0 comments

I think the weakness of your model is just because you have the right to distribute a certain patch level that does not mean you automatically have the right to distribute further patches,

Conversely, If the right to distribute is revoked, say a GPL to closed source license change you have still the right to distribute any versions originally distributed under the open license.

A good example off all this is the sordid history of the berkely db.

0 comments

fragmede3y ago

Exactly right - you can get the GPL source for v1.0 which you've bought and paid for access to the binaries, but there's nothing that says they have to sell you binaries for v1.1, and thus you don't have any right to v1.1's source, despite it being GPL.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointssomat3y ago0 comments

I think the weakness of your model is just because you have the right to distribute a certain patch level that does not mean you automatically have the right to distribute further patches,

Conversely, If the right to distribute is revoked, say a GPL to closed source license change you have still the right to distribute any versions originally distributed under the open license.

A good example off all this is the sordid history of the berkely db.

0 comments

fragmede3y ago

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse