> You can enable haptic feedback or tones (cringe)
Both of which are a poor substitute for feeling the button depress.
However, I was mostly concerned about feeling the button and the edges of the button before pressing it (to be able to use the buttons without looking), but I realize now that this might not be included in the commonly accepted meaning of "tactile feedback" ;)
> Are you specifically concerned about the having an icon for menu instead of the "menu" text?
No, but I am concerned about the poor choice of icon to represent the menu.
The back-button is understandable, but why does it go forward before it goes back?
And finally, my biggest problem: What does the icon-less button in the center of the Galaxy S do? I have no idea, and the only way to figure out is to test it. (If I have to guess, I'd say it's the home-button, which is otherwise lacking and is the closest in functionality to the icon-less iPhone-button)
(Image for reference: http://androidspin.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Samsung-Ga... )
I was also thinking about what I suppose must be the home-icon on the Galaxy Nexus. ( http://www.google.com/nexus/img/content/introduction.png ) This icon exhibits the classical problem of over-abstracting. It is no more a home or house than it is a shift-key, up-arrow or pointed rock.
Compare with HTC Legend: http://cdn.cbsi.com.au/story_media/339301189/htc-legend_1.jp...
From the left:
1. Obviously a house (and therefore a home), even with a chimney, while still being clear.
2. Obviously a menu-button. You unfortunately have to read it, but it is at least unambiguous.
3. Obviously a back-button. (No forward motion)
4. Assuming that the user has learned the weird currently popular icon for search, obviously search. Otherwise not a good icon.
----
I hope this clarifies my original post :)