It matters what portion of the cycle we are in. We used to be in the voting portion, now we are in the weighing machine portion and things are very different.

“In other words, the market is not a weighing machine, on which the value of each issue is recorded by an exact and impersonal mechanism, in accordance with its specific qualities. Rather should we say that the market is a voting machine, whereon countless individuals register choices which are the product partly of reason and partly of emotion.” -Security Analysis 1934

A company with no revenue can potentially raise at a higher valuation with a company of $1 of revenue - because now it’s real and investors will start making their mind up about the actual possiblities of the investment

I've heard this time and time again in SV circles. It probably is for the right founder who is able to paint a rosy picture and a nice story. I'm not that kind of person, so it's bonkers to me.

This was the Masayoshi Son/Adam Neumann playbook for WeWork... growth above all

In a way it isn’t because no revenue at all can excite the imagination infinitely more than underwhelming revenue.

> It’s satire…but is it?

Depends on your definition of value. If a companies max revenue is $X, the farther away from $X they are the more of a return you can hope to get!