An alternative is to have tie-breaks for every game, playing increasingly rapid time controls until the result is not a draw.

1. Classical game, win = 5 points.

2. Rapid game, win = 2 points

3. Blitz game, win = 1 point.

4. Armageddon game, win = 0.5 points.

This point layout might backfire and make the classical games even less interesting because the huge edge for winning is probably going to motivate extreme do-not-lose style play, which trends towards draws. But, nonetheless, wins in classical should be weighted well above the tie-breaks.

How would point ratio help if every game is a draw? Maybe if it was a round robin tournament that would help top two players competing for wins against less highly rated people and then drawing against each other. Like Liverpool and Man City