For example an image processing pipeline. You don't always want to log (it'd never scale) but as part of a trace you might want to keep the intermediate files so you can track down where the problem is. You've already got text logging for each step, recording metrics like duration and which filters were involved. I have saved files and referenced them in the logfile, but no log viewers I've seen understand anything beyond text. So I then have to build my own UI or open the images in turn.
Is there a pattern to handle this?
I've also heard of people storing those links in a database like Snowflake then creating displays on top using Tableau or Looker, to avoid having to build a web app from scratch.
Makes more sense this way, I think...
If you think about metrics, traces, and logs (software observability pillars) as three distinct things, it's hard to view metadata separate from metadata, lineage, or logs. Metadata is kind of the glue that holds everything together.
This article has more relevant sources, IMO, even if it is from a SaaS vendor.
https://www.montecarlodata.com/blog-what-is-data-observabili...
I don't know how to proceed with these posts (and this one), yet the temptation of mentally flagging these as friendly upvotes or point hoarders is strong, and I must admit that such posts receive less attention and more suspicion from me.
YMMV.
But I’m also generally skeptical of high upvote/comment ratios, because as a long-time HNer too I also want to read things that are genuinely interesting. In this case, I can promise you neither I nor anyone on the team is soliciting upvotes for this post.
On that note, if anyone has any comments about the content itself, happy to discuss further.
Thanks for having seen this from the start :)
I'm siding with you on this. I've "undowned" you and upvoted instead; Sorry xcamber!
--
If you're really concerned, email dang (hn@ycombinator.com) and ask him to look into it. As a sidenote, if you actually flag out of suspicion of a voting ring or other feelings without real evidence, it is abusing the power you've been entrusted with. Threads like this one are also way off topic, seems more considerate to submit an "Ask HN" post rather than hijack the story discussion.
The group dynamics are often surprising on HN.
How shocking is it that, on some article and topic, I do not have a comment I deem interesting enough to share?
Besides, if you do not appreciate my specificly off-topic contribution, then so be it.