So has civil asset forfeiture but that doesn't actually make it constitutional.
When a agent of the government wants to search mine or the property of my child, I'm going to make them get a warrant every time. I have nothing to hide, but it's not worth the risk of something being misunderstood or misinterpreted and ending up with consequences from this fishing expedition. They can "particularly describe the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized" along with their probable cause on the outset or not search at all. Terrorism isn't a sufficient reason to throw out the constitution, it's laughable to suggest name calling is.
My kid isn't old enough yet but stuff like this, monitoring software on laptop used for school (but purchased by parents) pushes me towards homeschooling.
I don't feel like semantic arguments. If an agent of the state engages in behavior that appellate courts have declared to be legal, you are unlikely to get redress by reporting this act to the police.
Specifically in Mendoza vs Klein ISD (from the paper) we see that the continued search of the phone after confirmation of texting in class was ruled unconstitutional.
Can a school have a policy about cyberbullying outside of school, and pursue a search in that case? This is untested.
As I said:
"The exact limits of a public school's authority to search mobile devices, to handle events that have partially occurred outside school, has not been established."
"My"
As in not the student.
MY phone.
Whether or not they have it is no excuse. It is MY device. MY rights have been firmly established.
> Whether or not they have it is no excuse. It is MY device. MY rights have been firmly established.
If your student takes "your" backpack to school, and there's a reason to search it, the fact that it is "your" property will not affect things much.
This is a highly dubious legal theory. Fourth amendment decisions about search of property on one's person basically never have to do with actual ownership.
(There are some exceptions, but generally to the detriment of the rights of the person/property being searched).
But that isn't true for a mobile device that contains none-school contents. Eg, does a student bringing their phone to school mean that a school can search their financial records through their mobile banking app? Digital diary? Electronic health records?
