>If you were maintaining that code for the next 6 years and there was no rush to ship it, it absolutely doesn't matter how fast it was written in the first place.
Unfortunately that's not how software is written.
>I would much rather take code that was written better in 6 hours, than bad code written in 45 mins. I'm not saying you wrote bad code, but time to ship, in general, rarely matters in this context.
I disagree, time is not the best proxy for good code.
10x engineer will probably write way better code in 45mins than -10x engineer in 6h.