undefined | Better HN

0 pointsscarface743y ago0 comments

Let’s say I’m a corporation who gives marital benefits. But some of my employees can’t get married because the state doesn’t allow gay marriage. Should the corporation not take a stance?

Should corporations not have taken a stance about doing business in South Africa before apartheid was abolished?

0 comments

xwdv3y ago

Taking a stance does nothing in either of these scenarios except send signals to people.

scarface74OP3y ago

So they shouldn’t extend health care benefits to an employees partners when they couldn’t legally get married?

Even paying for birth control as part of a woman’s health care benefit is consider political

xwdv3y ago

As a single man living in a single income household who also struggles to get married why don’t I get benefits to compensate for my lack of a partner?

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsscarface743y ago0 comments

Let’s say I’m a corporation who gives marital benefits. But some of my employees can’t get married because the state doesn’t allow gay marriage. Should the corporation not take a stance?

Should corporations not have taken a stance about doing business in South Africa before apartheid was abolished?

0 comments

xwdv3y ago

Taking a stance does nothing in either of these scenarios except send signals to people.

scarface74OP3y ago

So they shouldn’t extend health care benefits to an employees partners when they couldn’t legally get married?

Even paying for birth control as part of a woman’s health care benefit is consider political

xwdv3y ago

As a single man living in a single income household who also struggles to get married why don’t I get benefits to compensate for my lack of a partner?

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse