undefined | Better HN

0 pointsyucky3y ago0 comments

You haven't provided any evidence at all. So more than zero would be a start.

0 comments

Politics is a critical lens with which to view the world. That's what I mean when I say everything is political. Politicization is a process. Do you wish for me to go back ad infinitum with you giving me topics, and I attempt to politicize each one? I'm guessing here that is a waste of your time and mine because we'll be arguing whether I'm sufficiently politicizing each topic to reach your standard. That's what I mean when I ask for your evidentiary standard.

yuckyOP3y ago

You're just restating the same thing you already said, without providing any evidence. You're stating a belief, no different than "God is in everything" or "God is everywhere". It's an empty tautology, if everything is political, then the word is without meaning.

So "God is everywhere" is also a lens with which to view the world. It's based on the same amount of evidence.

kelseyfrog3y ago

You can look at anything scientifically, therefore science has no meaning. At this point you're arguing just to argue.

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 comments

kelseyfrog3y ago

yuckyOP3y ago

So "God is everywhere" is also a lens with which to view the world. It's based on the same amount of evidence.

kelseyfrog3y ago

You can look at anything scientifically, therefore science has no meaning. At this point you're arguing just to argue.

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse