If Meta does collapse due to Zuckerberg's missteps and there's a lot of very angry shareholders, it's possible that it'll result in this type of split-class voting shares becoming illegal. Financial regulations tend to be reactive rather than proactive, so things default to being legal until they very clearly are a problem.
But yeah, I haven't checked, but to my knowledge split-class voting shares are relatively recent innovations? It may take some corporate collapses before any change is made to the regulations.
Our legal system's default assumption is that contracts that aren't clearly exploitative are valid, and this seems pretty tame by that measure.
Even if VR is the future, there’s no indication that Meta is the company that knows how to build something people want here, let alone profit it at, but it continues to pour massive amounts of money, talent and executive attention into this, and it sounds like they’re not planning to change course.
Meta has earned its price drop.
If I knew someone was engaging with Facebook, I would think less of them. In the same way Facebook grew due to social factors, it can also wither due to social factors.
Facebook has gotten so much negative press that I can't imagine there being anyone but mercenaries working there now.
I certainly would not invest in that.
Dictatorships work great until they don't. Dictators get high off of their yes men until they lose touch with reality and start making critical errors.
Everything else fails in some way, usually the PC part. Most chat apps have some video chat function, but it sucks and is totally useless because it's only on the phone; there's no way to do it on a PC, so what's the point? I don't want to see shaky video from someone holding their phone in their hand. I can chat with people using Zoom, but that's a pain because it requires a native application, it's only for video chats (not for keeping a long-running text chat), so while it's great for business meetings it sucks for personal use.