This wasnt meant to generate valid scientific papers, and Lecun said so too. It generates interesting associations. It rambles sometimes and goes on tangents that are sometimes relevant sometimes not. It can inform you of related ideas that you were not aware of. It's like a fuzzy google scholar. It is in no way valid publishable research, but it's like a bicycle for researchers.

At least that was what i managed to find out for the brief time i toyed with it. This can save time instead of hunting down loads of citation trails.

What I really fail to see is what is wrong with having this buggy tool.

(Also, if you think that published papers contain true information, you should invest in my bridge)