undefined | Better HN

0 pointsriffraff3y ago0 comments

but a private entity (person or corp) does not have any obligation to protect ideas they find abhorrent to be considered on the side of "good".

0 comments

That's the point. They find free speech abhorrent but consider selling dangerous drugs to be acceptable.

So many people find them abhorrent because they represent different values.

Legally no one has any obligations here.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsriffraff3y ago0 comments

but a private entity (person or corp) does not have any obligation to protect ideas they find abhorrent to be considered on the side of "good".

That's the point. They find free speech abhorrent but consider selling dangerous drugs to be acceptable.

So many people find them abhorrent because they represent different values.

Legally no one has any obligations here.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse