Technically it’s a very interesting and valuable project. And there are many normal well adjusted humans beings working on it. It’s a shame people want it smeared out of existence because a Berkeley grad who no longer has anything to do with the project has weird political fantasies that some people don’t like. People really seem to struggle to separate the two. Makes it feel deliberate.

I'm out of the loop but intrigued.

Can you explain what the controversy is? In what way are Bergson / Popper and Mill said to disagreed and what does it have to do with (Urbit?) conference codes of conduct?

Then you must be the lightning itself, creating an account to ionise and electrically charge the thread I guess.