undefined | Better HN

0 pointspjmlp3y ago0 comments

It surely does, including stack values.

That is the thing, Lisp is not only lists unless one is stuck using Lisp 1.5.

0 comments

i dont think were talking about the same thing unless youre claiming that common lisp can be non garbage collected. otherwise stack allocation is very implementation dependent

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointspjmlp3y ago0 comments

It surely does, including stack values.

That is the thing, Lisp is not only lists unless one is stuck using Lisp 1.5.

0 comments

medo-bear3y ago

i dont think were talking about the same thing unless youre claiming that common lisp can be non garbage collected. otherwise stack allocation is very implementation dependent

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse