undefined | Better HN

0 pointswmil14y ago0 comments

The problem is that isn't not just 10,000 hours. It's 10,000 hours of "mindful practice".

That amounts to a huge, ill defined, fudge factor that allows you to discount any counter examples.

So it's not clear that 10,000 hours is a falsifiable statement.

0 comments

So it's not clear that 10,000 hours is a falsifiable statement.

It not as tightly defined as we'd like, but I think it's still fairly close to falsifiable. For example, I think the Dan Plan is a good experiment. He has a pro golf coach and clearly is doing deliberate practice. It's only one data point, but I think if we get several people like Dan who tend to fall on one side or the other then I think we have strengtened or weakened the theory significantly.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointswmil14y ago0 comments

The problem is that isn't not just 10,000 hours. It's 10,000 hours of "mindful practice".

That amounts to a huge, ill defined, fudge factor that allows you to discount any counter examples.

So it's not clear that 10,000 hours is a falsifiable statement.

0 comments

kenjackson14y ago

So it's not clear that 10,000 hours is a falsifiable statement.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse