I disagree with this. I think this falls under Musk's idea that "sunlight is the best disinfectant." [0] Is sunlight the best disinfectant if January 6 groups are finding like minded individuals to commit assassinations. [1]
> 2. Only the original author may remove content they produce.
What Twitter is doing with ghost banning is unsustainable. The only reason groups such as #NAFO haven't left the platform is because they band together to upvote their posts and comments. But the average person that is shadow banned for calling Musk a jerk or whatever won't see any engagement because their comment will be hidden behind "Show more replies." Compare this to reddit. Your comment is either accepted or rejected. There isn't a grey area.
> 3. Moderation is best implemented by algorithmic choice.
I don't have a firm opinion on this in general. Moderation by a team seems too slow for real-time Twitter. Perhaps on tweets that get 10,000 replies moderation makes a lot of sense. But on a tweet that gets 100 replies should some tweets be behind "Show more replies" or should they just be at the end of the scroll?
I don't see any discussion on how to prioritize tweets from people that don't have a massive following. Some of the tweets I see from people with 10 followers are basically the same as those with 20,000 followers. Why does the guy with 20k tweets get more engagement?
The dynamic on twitter with the average user is so different from Reddit. Getting upvotes and engagement on Reddit is 10x easier.
[0] https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1521574200183566338
[1] https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/16/us/politics/jan-6-defenda...
Not true, not anymore at least.
Used to be that comments downvoted beyond a threshold automatically folded the comment branch, making it less visible. Now it does that for upvoted comments as well, for an unclear reason (untrusted accounts or something?).
https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/social-media/twitter-strikes-de...
https://www.axios.com/2021/11/30/jack-dorsey-twitter-departu...