undefined | Better HN

0 pointsezfe3y ago0 comments

I mean, I think it's standard operating procedure not to allow any interaction except through proper channels when there's litigation involved, and they can apply this here.

I don't think barring someone from your property is a good punishment against someone who is trying to sue you, since that kinda implies they "dislike" you already and wouldn't want to engage with you

0 comments

azernik3y ago

All that is well and good for a plaintiff. But their lawyer? Or any other lawyer who works at the same firm? Nah, this is bananas.

eppp3y ago

So if google is suing ticketmaster then ticketmaster banning google employees would be ok?

azernik3y ago

Definitely not okay, just pointing out the different kind of craziness at play here.

(In that case it would be purely the holding employees with no connection to the specific actions responsible for what their employer does.)

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsezfe3y ago0 comments

I mean, I think it's standard operating procedure not to allow any interaction except through proper channels when there's litigation involved, and they can apply this here.

0 comments

azernik3y ago

All that is well and good for a plaintiff. But their lawyer? Or any other lawyer who works at the same firm? Nah, this is bananas.

eppp3y ago

So if google is suing ticketmaster then ticketmaster banning google employees would be ok?

azernik3y ago

Definitely not okay, just pointing out the different kind of craziness at play here.

(In that case it would be purely the holding employees with no connection to the specific actions responsible for what their employer does.)

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse