For something like starting a fight, you can go by actual court records, which are public and have processes in place to correct them if they're wrong (and we have rules about e.g. when convictions should be expunged). Just sharing lists of names is too abusable.

I have several concrete problems with these lists.

1. Secrecy. I should have a right to know if I’m on the black list.

2. Due process. There is no process to being put on the black list. Partially because you don’t know it’s happening, there’s no way to contest it.

3. Permanency. The punishment should fit the crime. If you do something at 18 that shouldn’t be a lifetime punishment. However being on a secret list of names and faces distributed between companies is a lifetime punishment.

> If the list is too inaccurate, it stops doing its job and becomes a net-no-help to the venue using it.

This is an extremely optimistic take. In reality, what is the threshold of false positives where the list stops being useful? One percent? Five percent? Hell, even if the list is 10% wrong you’re still denying people who should be denied 90% of the time. And there will always be a stigma against people who are on such lists. “You must’ve done something to get on that list.”

A community of people aren't built around absolutism. They are built around give and take.

You can't have your best day, every day.

I really dislike this way of thought. It could be me that one day went my world went to shits. And then I’m also burned forever.